Skip to content

Isi Perjanjian New York Agreement

Pertama, menghindari peran orang West Papua, selaku tuan tanah. Kalau melibatkan mereka (orang West Papua) nanti ribut, diprotes dan ditolak, dipersulit dan itu menghambat kepentingan terselubung (ekonomi) lainnya. Untuk menghindari kemungkinan itu, mereka mengesahkan perjanjian itu di sana; In March 1961, Indonesia served an agreement on the United Nations Trust on the condition that it not be classified as a trust. [9] Both supporters of Indonesia and supporters of the Netherlands in government have described their positions as positive for anticolonialism. Although the idea of Papua`s independence appealed to high-ranking advisers in the U.S. government, few felt it was realistic. U.S. officials also expressed concern about the world`s appreciation of Indonesia; In January 1962, Egypt closed its Suez Canal to Dutch ships in protest against the Dutch policy of New Guinea. In mid-January, Robert F. Kennedy, President Kennedy`s brother, visited Jakarta, announcing that the United States “feels attached to anticolonialism as a former colony.” [8] Negara imperialis AS saat itu memiliki kekuatan militater yang luar biasa dan permainan intelijen (CIA) yang sulit diterabas oleh orang West Papua. Keduanya meneken perjanjian tanpa tuan itu dalam sayap kekuatan dan kepentingan ekonomi AS. However, at the 1949 Dutch-Indonesian roundtable, both Indonesia and the Netherlands failed to agree on the status of New Guinea, with the Netherlands arguing that Western New Guinea should remain in place for the eventual self-determination of the natives once they are sufficiently “ripe”.

[4] The resulting agreement was unclear on New Guinea`s final status, although the Dutch Workers` Party rejected an amendment that would explicitly exclude New Guinea from Indonesian independence. [3] Beginning in 1951, the Indonesian government interpreted the results of the Round Table Conference to restore sovereignty over all former Dutch East Indies, including New Guinea. [4] During negotiations with the Indonesians, the Netherlands stated that it could relinquish sovereignty over Dutch New Guinea because the conservative parties of the Dutch parliament, deeply humiliated by Indonesia`s independence and wishing to retain a colonial stronghold in the region, would not vote to ratify such an agreement. [3] When the Indonesian government withdrew from the Dutch-Indonesian Union, frustrated by the slow pace of talks on New Guinea, the Netherlands felt free of any obligation to continue negotiations on the issue. [4] Indonesia, supported by all African and Asian nations except nationalist China, attempted to pass a UN General Assembly resolution calling on the Netherlands to negotiate with it the status of Western New Guinea. But the resolutions were blocked by opposition from all Western nations except Greece. [5] Kedua, mempersulit akses bagi orang West Papua. Alasan terselubungnya adalah keamanan, ketertiban, dan kedamaian. Untuk menghindari kekacauan, protes , dan kerusuhan di West Papua, maka mereka mengikat perjanjian tanpa tuan di AS; Hampir semua lembaran fakta sejarah penting di West Papua berkaitan dengan perundingan tanpa partisipasi orang West Papua selaku tuan tanah.