Skip to content

What Is A Federal Mobility Agreement

Complainant Gallegos was a forensic police officer with GS-13. As a condition of its commitment, Gallegos was required to execute a mobility agreement in which it recognized that any non-acceptance of a geographic reallocation could subordinate a separation from the federal service. In 2012, Gallegos reported on a targeted redistribution from Florida to Virginia. She objected to the reassignment and the Agency removed it by accusing it of “not fulfilling a condition of employment”. The answer to the first question is usually yes, your work can be relocated and non-relocation may be a reason for the remoteness. Most federal employees know that senior executive service members are subject to hijacked sites, but it is less well known that the same security vulnerability exists for other employees. If the government wants to get you moving, they have to pay for moving expenses, including real estate, temporary quarters and transportation of household goods. Source: I work for the government and we have mobility agreements. Workers wishing to take positions subject to mobility agreements should be fully aware that any geographical non-reallocation could lead to expulsion without recourse. The Board of Directors concluded by stating that if it accepted Gallegos` assertion, it would intrude on the Agency`s management`s decision to determine the requirements and conditions of the position within its staff, and that the Agency`s policy would establish legitimate reasons for managing the mobility requirement – organizational efficiency and career development of staff. Without mentioning the benefits of this proposal or any other, the idea of targeted redistribution in different sectors of the shuttle is worth discussing. Can the government force you to relocate or risk losing your job? Do they need congressional approval? Do you have to have a mobility agreement? What are the opportunities for employees when their jobs move, but they don`t want to participate? For a short move 40 miles away, federal radio reported that 70 percent of employees moved with their jobs when the Defense Information Systems Agency moved to Fort Meade, Maryland, while 15 percent found other jobs and 15 percent retired.

The U.S. Department of the Army said it expects about 30% of employees to move in BRAC-related moves. The Defence Logistics Agency had a similar experience. Most employees made short-distance movements, but were unseasing or unable to make big steps. The number of people moving with their workplaces may be influenced by the number of federal jobs in the loss sector. The more jobs the region has, the more people will remain. Given the increase in the number of federal employees who can now retire, I would expect an even greater number of retirements than in the case of BRAC. Before paying an incentive to relocate, an agency must develop an incentive plan for relocation. The plan must include the appointment of officials who are entitled to verify and approve the payment of relocation incentives, the appointment of officials entitled to waive the reimbursement of a relocation incentive, categories of workers who may not receive an incentive to relocate, the documents necessary to determine that a position is likely to be difficult to fill , requirements to determine the level of incentive to relocate, authorized payment methods, mandatory service agreements (including criteria for determining the length of a period of service, conditions for termination of a service contract, and agency and staff obligations when a service contract is terminated), as well as documentation and registration requirements.