Skip to content

Service Agreement For Supported Independent Living

NDIA has responded to the OPA`s recommendations regarding service agreements and will use them in the development of the takeover equipment. The report provides a full list of the OPA recommendations and the NDIA response. However, service providers do not need to wait for NDIA instructions, but are now starting to review your service agreements. Ensure that the agreements cover relevant practical standards and verify abusive clauses (would you like your loved one to sign them?). Develop processes for entering alternatives to written service agreements (evidence is key) and understand who can accept what (recognize that it may be different for individuals). It`s a complex system to navigate, yes, but at the end of the day, that`s what choice and control is all over. Because the OPA found that many NDIS service agreements contain issues beyond its decision-making power, they developed standard decisions on assistance services and issues within the guardian`s jurisdiction to give their consent on behalf of the person represented. [9] This is another complex and widely misunderstood area. In most cases, a service agreement should be reached between the participant and the service provider in a format that the participant will most likely understand. However, there are a number of variables, including the content of the service agreement and all alternative decision makers who are appointed (and for whom this is important). [5] NDIS Service Agreements: Decision-making and control for 2019 by a financial administrator/administrator can only sign the parties to a service contract affecting the participant`s financial issues. [10] A financial administrator is generally appointed to manage an individual`s personal wealth and resources (unlike NDIS funding). [11] [12] Personal responsibilities – Issues that are beyond the control of a takeover keeper (and sometimes a plan candidate) are often included in service agreements under the title “Your Responsibilities.” As has already been said, these are responsible personal responsibilities, which are generally subject to the exclusive control of the participant.

It would be more appropriate to directly agree on these issues with the participant, while acknowledging any restrictions on the individual`s ability to understand or meet obligations. [18] Anti-competitive issues – exclusion clauses designed to prevent a participant from hiring an employee of the service provider in the future. These clauses are intended to control access to the claimant`s staff beyond the conclusion of the service contract. If the participant is unable to sign a service contract and there is no legal authority to sign the agreement on his or her behalf, an assistance coordinator may consider the possibility that the service will be provided without signing the agreement, provided there is no conflict or threat to a person`s well-being. [19] The takeover proposes that if a service reservation is made without agreement, a statement identifying the services to be provided (including the standard of services) must be provided to the individual and the person concerned. [20] Depending on the scope of the authority, a designated guardian may determine which services are suitable for an NDIS participant, but may not be authorized to manage financial matters. Thus, while a guardian can make a decision about a person`s accommodation or services, he or she may not sign a rental agreement requiring a person to pay. B rent or damages. Personal responsibilities that are not controlled by the guardian could also be negotiated directly with the participant, such as. B the treatment of employees with courtesy and respect. [7] The Queensland Public Guardian states that, although it may accept the provision of certain NDIS services, it will generally not sign any service contract on behalf of adults.